IT is absolutely essential that we all do whatever we can to prevent the selling-off of Royal Mail ("Clarion call to safeguard six-day post pledge from privatisation", The Herald, June 5).
It is bad enough that remote (north of the Highland Line at best) areas will inevitably lose their daily deliveries and be surcharged for being remote, but we will all suffer from what is already seriously inferior service from the private companies.
I was following the progress of an urgent package destined for my company located in the main industrial estate in Perth, at the tip of the M90 from Edinburgh. For several days the website of a major courier company showed it at Edinburgh Airport, with the caption "remote location, irregular deliveries".
I hate to think how many hours we have wasted in the last few weeks alone, chasing up lost, misrouted or otherwise delayed deliveries - we process every order or inquiry the day it is received, but we cannot tell our customers when they will receive their goods because the courier companies are so unreliable.
A colleague handed a package into the local depot of one of these companies for onward delivery. That was the last that was seen of it. We sent a trial half-dozen consignments by another of the large names, three were never seen again.
Trying to get information through their automated systems is pretty well impossible, and it is totally impossible to get to speak to anyone in authority.
To add insult to injury, any compensation paid has to be hard fought for and is pitiful compared with the value of the loss.
There is no "best", just the "least worse".
Royal Mail is not perfect, but the number of problems caused is infinitesimal compared with any of the private companies. We know, we have tried most of them.
Jim Clark,
8 Thistle Place, Scone.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article