On the face of it, Lufthansa's decision to switch its service to Dusseldorf from Edinburgh Airport to Glasgow is a simple function of competition, albeit a disappointing one from my perspective ("Glasgow joy as German airline switches route", The Herald, December 13).
However, a closer look at this story highlights a number of interesting and serious issues, particularly around the use of public money to affect competition.
My starting point is that real competition is a good thing, and will ultimately provide passengers from across Scotland with a better service and range of choices than they have today.
I further believe that public money and bodies such as VisitScotland can and should be used to bring new routes to Scotland, and to ensure their longevity. This is clearly in our national strategic interest.
On the other hand, I would be extremely concerned if Scottish taxpayers' money was being used to distort competition between two Scottish airports, and if Scotland's public bodies were involved in the commercial negotiations.
It is now a matter of obvious public interest that we know exactly how much, if any, public money is being invested in Lufthansa's move to Glasgow and who exactly was round the table as a deal was being done to move a flight from one Scottish airport to another.
Competition only works on a level playing field, and you can bet your last pound that I will compete hard for air routes and will not think twice about asking airlines to move from Glasgow to Edinburgh.
But I will always do so in a fair, transparent and commercial way. For Scotland's people to benefit from the new dynamic of competition created by the break-up of BAA's unhealthy stranglehold on the UK's airports market, then that must be the only way.
Gordon Dewar,
Chief Executive Officer,
Edinburgh Airport,
Turnhouse Road, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article