I CONGRATULATE George Devlin on his erudite and obviously deeply-felt letter on David Cameron's attempt to hijack the centenary of the start of the First World War for narrow political ends (Letters, October 13).
If there is any justice, this attempt to divert the Scottish electorate just before the independence referendum will backfire on the Prime Minister.
In our local cemetery is a memorial to a well-loved local doctor who died in 1925, many years before I was born. It is obvious from the inscription that he was a man whose life was one of service and self-sacrifice. Also inscribed on the stone is a memorial to his son who died in the First World War aged 18. The boy was a 2nd lieutenant in the Royal Flying Corps and was on secondment from the Cameron Highlanders. He also bore the surname he got from his father, Loanhead's own beloved Doctor Cameron.
When I think of that tragic war, I think of a good doctor ministering all those years to the medical needs of a small mining town while carrying with him his grief at the loss of a boy who had not yet begun to live.
I fancy David Cameron's thoughts will not turn to a humble physician in a wee Scottish town and the terrible sacrifice he and thousands of other humble people made.
David C Purdie,
12 Mayburn Vale,
Loanhead.
I DO not agree with Donald Kerr's assertion that David Cameron's wish to commemorate the centenary of the start of the First World War on the anniversary of its historical date is in any way a cynical attempt to have an impact on the forthcoming independence referendum (Letters, October 13).
The cynicism lies with our First Minister who has chosen to wrap himself in the Saltire in 2014 in a blatant attempt to hijack public opinion by embracing the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, the Ryder Cup at Gleneagles and the 700th anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn to underpin the final weeks of his independence campaign.
Ronald J Sandford,
1 Scott Garden,
Kingsbarns.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article