WITH more of a sigh of relief than any fanfare, former prime minister Tony Blair stood down last week from his grandiose position as peace envoy to the Middle East.
It is tempting to ask if anyone will really notice. Appointed in 2007 as the lead diplomat to the Quartet Group representing the UN, the EU, the US and Russia, Blair's task was to "mobilise international assistance, address the rule of law and promote Palestinian economic development".
Basically, that meant dealing with the peace process between the Israelis and the Palestinians and making it work.
On all counts he failed and it is safe to say that his absence will not be felt by anyone in the Middle East - apart from Israeli politicians on the right who warmed to his steady condemnation of the dangers posed by Iran. When Blair arrived in the job it was hoped that he would bring with him some of the experience gained in the Northern Ireland peace process of the late 1990s but instead he carried too much baggage from his role as a leader who had aided and abetted the illegal US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
That was an onerous halter around his neck and it prevented him from being taken seriously.
Arabs could never forgive him for that lack of judgement and he compounded the error by failing to criticise Israel for inflicting heavy civilian casualties in Gaza. And then there was the cost and extravagance of his expensively maintained headquarters in Jerusalem. When there, he had very little to say.
The people of Israel and Palestine deserve better than that. If Blair is to be replaced by the Quartet, it must be with a politician who understands the many nuances of the Middle East and comes with a reputation for strict neutrality. As it is, Tony Blair's only legacy is a region riven by civil war and threatened by the extremists of Islamic State.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article