THERE has been great anger at the £400,000 payout from public funds to the former directors of the company which failed so miserably to build the Edinburgh tram system.
And rightly so. It is completely unfair that individuals from Trams Initiative Edinburgh should be trousering sums in excess of £80k while other failures in the public sector go unrewarded.
How about the civil servants who were involved in the Scottish Parliament building project and who oversaw the budget rising from £50 million to £414m?
Shouldn't they have got a piece of the action, a small percentage of what may be called the vigorish.
On a lesser scale but very high in the league table of ineptitude, consider the folk in the South Lanarkshire Council finance department who were duped by an online invoice and sent £102,000 to some fraudsters in Nigeria.
Did they get a wee bonus at the end of the month?
How about those officials at Argyll and Bute council who banned nine-year-old pupil Martha Payne from blogging photos of her school dinners and then issued a press release trying to justify the censorship (which they later reversed).
Such monumental municipal mismanagement should be recognised. If not financially, then at least in some small way in the next honours list.
In a fair society, rewards for failure should trickle down to all levels of the workforce. Bonuses for unemptied bins.
Special payments for headmasters of schools where weans leave with fewest qualifications. And maybe the worst school dinners.
There should also be rewards for success. I hope whoever is running the Glasgow and Edinburgh bus lane fines departments is getting a kick-back from the many thousands of pounds the councils are raking in. Time, too, that parking wardens got a bounty on each ticket issued.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article