IT is depressing that in the Calton and Springburn one in two weans is mired in child poverty.
In the rest of Glasgow it's one in three.
Child poverty is defined as living in a household where the money coming in is less than 60% of UK median earnings of £25,000. There is a simple solution to child poverty. It's called reasonably-paid employment for the parents. Don't expect this Government, or any, to implement such a policy any time soon.
I remember when my family had to live on very little money. Scraping together pennies at the end of the week to buy a loaf. No butter. Just Echo, the margarine that could in no way be confused even with Stork. Echo, the stuff that was also used to remove tar from your legs. But enough of my hard times, which were brief and not very hard at all.
In the absence of an immediate end to child poverty, I suggest a manifesto of children's rights regardless of family income:
n At least one parent who is not permanently drunk or off their face with drugs. Failing this, access to a safe foster home.
n A bowl of porridge before school. Or, a preferred option these days, a visit to the breakfast club.
n A pair of shoes that don't leak.
n A bath once a week whether you need one or not.
n Regular servings of macaroni and cheese with a crispy top and hot buttered toast. Mince and tatties for carnivores.
n No money for biscuits but you help mum bake cakes.
n The telly is switched off so the family can read library books.
n You have been brought up to regard good, clean second-hand clothes as no problem.
n You have been brought up to disregard expensive designer labels. And the confidence to see off the bully who disses your denims.
n Your homework is correct because dad is keeping up with a refresher course in maths.
n You are in child poverty but somehow the parents got you a cool computer even though the keyboard is a bit worn.
n You begin your autobiography with: "We were poor but we were happy-"
Which might be a best-seller if it started: "When I look back on my childhood, I wonder how I survived at all-"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article