THE Court of Appeal has ruled against two disabled people who sued for distress caused during a flight.
Apparently, under the Montreal Convention on air travel, there is no requirement, once the wheels have left the Tarmac, to treat passengers with dignity. Frequent flyers on no-frills airlines may already know this.
Lawyers say the ruling removes any obstacles to the imposition of a surcharge on obese customers. It is only a matter of time before low weight becomes a prerequisite for low fare.
How will the fare system work? It will be too complicated to use body mass index or waist-to-hip ratio. So expect a surcharge on a sliding scale for anyone weighing more than 100 kilos.
This is bad news for those who are tall but not obese. But good news for small, thin people who can avoid excess baggage charges by wearing five layers of clothing including a large coat with poacher's pockets.
Checks at the departure gate will be rigorous. The existing process of weighing carry-on luggage and making sure it fits the metal-frame device will continue.
Passengers who are borderline chubby will also have to step on to scales. Then sit in an airplane seat to prove they fit without ripples of fat overflowing into the adjacent passenger's space. (Budget airlines will have a £10 surcharge for those who wish to be weighed in privacy behind a screen.) The going rate for excess weight is up to £20 a kilo. To avoid hefty charges at the airport, passengers will be able to declare and pay for extra avoirdupois when booking online. There will be the option for the extremely broad-beamed to purchase two seats.
There will be a requirement not to be above the declared weight on the day of departure. Another incentive to go on that diet before the holidays.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article