DUTCH academics writing in the Journal Of Applied Social Psychology say that idle chat can have a positive effect in society.
Gossip enables people to warn each other against those who behave badly.
How different our world might have been if some neighbours in the Garden of Eden housing estate had kept an eye on Eve. Being seduced by that snake next door. A right bad apple. No wonder her and Adam got evicted from Paradise. Mark my words, their boy Cain will come to no good.
Some other women in history who set tongues wagging-
Cleopatra. There's no Roman general safe with her about the place. And there's definitely something going on with the milkman, that's a lot of asses' milk she gets delivered. Her shenanigans are bound to come back to bite her. Mind you, she had a lot to put up with, her daddy also being her uncle and her mammy her auntie. What a family the Ptolomys are. Not even proper Egyptians, immigrants from Greece.
That Lucrezia Borgia? Pure poison with the drink so she is. And her faither a pope as well.
Marie Antoinette. It's a dead liberté. The rest of us putting up with austerité but there's nae egalité while she's living high off the hog up at Versailles. She's fair upset the folk without bread by saying just bake a cake. These Bourbons take the biscuit. Madame Defarge says Marie Antoinette really rips her knitting.
Many men in history might have had their evil ways reined in by some constructive gossiping – Stalin, Pol Pot, Nero. But we have room only for the boy Adolf Schicklgruber, whose neighbours said what a natural leader he was. Organising his wee pals into armies. But they worried about his talk of changing his name and invading Poland when he grew up.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article