Brown is boring, taupe tedious and beige - well, beige is just beige, isn't it?
It's the colour scheme of over-styled home catalogues and retirement homes.
Yet when it comes to eye colour beige, brown and taupe are the Warren Beatty and Annette Bening of the make-up counter. Classic and enduring, they suit everyone and are favoured by most women, who buy these earthy eye colours in their millions.
But why are we all drawn to the snooze spectrum when it comes to our make-up? Why can't we be a bit more like Zandra Rhodes or Katy Perry and develop a penchant for bright colour? The answer is simple: it's because unless you have an internationally-renowned make-up artist to hand, primary colours don't look great. Brown, beige and taupe always look better.
Like everyone else who is attracted to the jewel-like colours on beauty counters, I have tried to get along with bright colour. I've tried to experiment with a hint of azure round my lids, or sunray yellow around my socket (you've no idea the range of strangely named eyeshadows that land on my desk), but with no great success. When it comes to getting dressed up for an occasion, looking my best, I always default to the neutral setting in my make-up bag. Recently, with great glee, I've discovered that my default cosmetic choices have come back into fashion. The taupe eye, along with more natural-looking make-up, is back.
These are the brown-toned eyeshadows floating my boat: Tom Ford Platinum Cream Eyeshadow (£28); Estee Lauder Bronze Sands eyeshadow compact (£35); and Clinique Colour Surge Eyeshadow Duo in Deco-Dence (£20).
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article