Anti-gobbledegook campaigners are angry with coffee shops that flout the English language by offering customers “regular” sized drinks.
The Plain English Campaign, which crusades for clear language in public life, said regular was a meaningless term and has demanded that shops and cafes instead ask customers if they want “small, medium or large”.
A campaign spokeswoman said: “Almost every cafe now seems to ask if you want regular. They seem to use the word ‘regular’ when they really mean ‘small’ or ‘medium’. That’s not what ‘regular’ means – it’s irregular use of language.
“Large is the opposite of small, not the opposite of regular. The comedy duo was ‘Little and Large’ not ‘Regular and Large’ – and small, medium and large are all regular sizes.
“The opposite of regular is irregular. We didn’t learn about regular and large verbs at school. Perhaps we should start asking for an ‘irregular coffee’ – I wonder what that would be?”
She added: “We have three perfectly good words to describe drink sizes, which everyone understands. Cafes should stick to them and stop pointlessly offering this meaningless ‘regular’ size.”
Regular is one of the many words the coffee industry has brought into everyday use. In a market dominated by American multinationals, phrases like “do you want that to go?” or the use of “skinny” to describe a low-calorie drink have become de rigeur.
Coffee chain Starbucks has previously been criticised for using a bewildering lexicon to describe its drinks. Its customers can ask for a Venti Soy Caramel Macchiato – a large mug of foamed milk with espresso and vanilla – or a Chai Creme Frappuccino – a tea drink made with whipped cream and flavoured with spices.
The Plain English Campaign has previously roasted public bodies and multinational companies like Coca Cola for their use of rambling, bureaucratic waffle.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article