What is it?
An Android-centric media streaming box.
How will it change my life?
Google made waves last year with the Chromecast which allows media streaming from Android devices to your television. This year they have set their sights on enhancing the living-room experience and branching out into TV services with the Nexus Player.
Good points?
Google have essentially attempted to address the faults of the Chromecast and rebrand it as something more evolved by adding a proper remote control, slick interface, online streaming and access to apps from the Play Store. The flattened circle design of the box is unusual compared to its rivals and can comfortably sit in even the tightest of spaces.
The remote control is simply presented but effective and similar to those of modern DVD players with the added functionality of a built-in microphone for rapid voice searching. The content is provided from any connected device via Google cast including BBC iPlayer, NOW TV, BT Sport and Netflix which are seamless on screen despite the roundabout way the services are delivered. The available Gamepad accessory adds a different dimension to Android mobile gaming by giving them a greater stage.
Bad points?
Despite a package that promises much it still seems a little empty, a bit like an absent-minded professor. A device that depends and concentrates on an internet connection should provide an Ethernet port for stability and speed, but instead the Nexus Player relies solely on WiFi. Most of the content is only available through your smartphone which is not ideal for a media centre.
Best for ...
Android lovers looking for a quick upgrade to Chromecast without losing integration with their other mobile gadgets.
Avoid if ...
You are content with TV minus the bells and whistles of app access. Unless your gadgets are predominantly Android there is not a lot to be gained.
Score: 7/10, until more compatible games and services are released you are better plumping for the Chromecast at half the price or Amazon Fire TV.
Google Nexus Player, £79.99 (store.google.com)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article