What is it?
A Google Chromebook with a high-end laptop feel.
Chromebooks have traditionally been the domain of web users who prefer the convenience of a built-in qwerty keyboard over using a tablet.
Google's latest offering comes in two options and attempts to bridge the gap between handheld devices and full-blown laptop.
Good points?
The evolution of the humble Chromebook is clear to see. Gone are the flimsy screen and low-end hardware, which instead has been replaced with a 7th generation Intel core i5 processor and a Quad HD LCD touchscreen.
The display design is impressive with dual swivel hinges which enable the screen to be folded perfectly flush behind the keyboard. This allows the user to handle the device like a tablet without any awkward edges and bulk.
The cheapest option boasts 8GB RAM and a 128GB SSD hard drive which enables fast operation of the Chrome OS and Android applications.
Most laptops struggle with keyboard implementation but the Pixelbook has this covered with solid functional keys well-spaced and backlit where needed.
Although the battery life isn't quite the 10 hours indicated by Google, I found it more than adequate given the power requirements of the components involved.
Bad points?
Despite all its positives the Pixelbook is still a Chromebook and is bound by such limitations. Priced at a little under £1000 with no accessories is excessive when compared to more versatile products such as a Surface Pro.
Best for ...
Chromebook lovers looking to upgrade their outdated equipment and replace it with something more futureproof.
Avoid if ...
You require corporate features like an Ethernet port or memory card slot. Wired network connections also required a separate USB adapter not supplied.
Score: 7/10.
Google Pixelbook, £999 (store.google.com)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here