Lord Mandelson has raised the prospect of an age of austerity in Britain under Labour, with spending cuts and efficiency savings running right the way through to 2020.
In the gloomiest assessment to date by a UK Government minister, the Business Secretary said there would be "constraints for the next decade", sharply contrasting the next 10 years with the previous 10 years of growth and high spending.
The language and tone appeared to be another significant shift in nuancing the government's underlying message.
The Conservatives accused the Cabinet of being split down the middle on spending cuts.
Earlier this month, Whitehall sources suggested some Cabinet ministers felt Gordon Brown's black-and-white "Labour spending versus Tory cuts" strategy was too simplistic and needed to be "refined" with more talk of "targeted investment" and "efficiency savings".
Coincidentally, Lord Mandelson's remarks yesterday over lunch with Westminster journalists came hours after a poll showed the public was keener on the Tory message of the need for spending cuts rather than on the Labour one of spending increases to fight through the recession.
The Secretary of State said: "The fall in the economy is coming to an end but the severity obviously is not yet behind us. But for all the fragile signs of economic recovery, we have not yet pulled out of the recession."
He emphasised how the economic imperative was the same in the short and long term - to achieve economic growth to create jobs - and he explained it was important for the nation not to lose its nerve in the face of necessary high borrowing to deal with the costs of recession."
Lord Mandelson then said: "Of course, there will be pressures on spending after 2011 and constraints for the next decade. This depends above all on our success in preventing short-term unemployment turning into long-term joblessness and our investments in those sources of future employment continuing."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article