Andras Schiff
Andras Schiff
Usher Hall, Edinburgh
Kate Molleson
AndrAs Schiff has never been a particularly demonstrative player, and as he gets older his interpretations seem to be getting simultaneously more distilled and more playful. It's a wonderful combination, but it doesn't always grab you immediately: his special artistry can take time to reveal itself, as it did in this recital.
The Hungarian pianist spent much of last year (his 60th birthday year) in the company of two composers - Beethoven and Bach - and it was with Beethoven that he opened this programme. He played the Sonata in E minor Opus 90 and the Sonata in A major Opus 101 crisply, almost coolly, with a neatness that seemed to negate all possibility of risk. The tempo of Opus 90 pushes and pulls like a music box constantly running out of puff, but Schiff kept us on ultra-safe ground. His account of Opus 101's slow movement flashbacks was equally reserved - just a hint of frailty, more noble reminiscence than the psychological breakdown the passage can sound in some hands.
As the recital unfolded, though, Schiff's demeanour seemed to loosen. He played Bartok's 1926 Piano Sonata with the passion of a compatriot; the outer movements were sparky, bright and puckish - he leapt from the piano stool as he flung out the work's final octaves. Leos Janacek composed his Piano Sonata From the Street, 1 October 1905 in response to the shooting of a Czech protester in Brno on that date; Schiff brought a deeply-felt pathos to the second movement (subtitled simply Death), granting space and gravitas to its stately repetitions. The recital ended with Schubert's Sonata in G D894 - relaxed, tuneful and warm.
This review appeared in later editions of yesterday's Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article