Music
BBC SSO, City Hall, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
three stars
UNQUESTIONABLY, the talk of the night on Thursday at the BBC SSO's concert with conductor Andrew Manze was the (probably) first professional performance of the First Symphony by Swedish composer Wilhelm Stehammar, first played in the UK just 30 years ago by the Dalkeith Symphony Orchestra conducted by (now) former headmaster Malcolm Porteous, who was at Thursday's concert.
That's a plethora of 'firsts' in one sentence, but that's the way it was. The symphony, (1902/03) a huge, four-movement epic, is unashamedly Romantic, massively-eclectic, suffused with influences and echoes from Brahms, Bruckner and Wagner, and drenched with seductively-golden French horn tones and flourishes, though perhaps lacking a single distinctive theme that would set it apart from its near-stablemates.
None the less, there is not a single objectionable feature in the music, richly-played by the SSO, though perhaps a more swashbuckling approach than Manze's might have ignited the piece more. Still, it was a thrill to hear, and, personally, I was delighted to be regaled in Candleriggs by Mr Porteous (now 79) about his adventures in securing a score of the rarity.
But it wasn't the only rarity of the night, with an enthralling account of Sibelius's Karelia Overture, infinitely less known than the familiar Suite, but a hugely-integrated and commanding piece in its own right, and Steven Osborne's performance of Beethoven's Second Piano Concerto, completing his cycle, poetic in its slow movement, unleashing the young composer's sparkling, crispy wit in the finale, and transforming the first movement cadenza by replacing the more densely-contrapuntal of Beethoven's passages with Osborne's own, consistently-thematic, and hugely-effective elements. Insights all round on Thursday night. That's what it's all about.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article