Simon Cowell appears to have lost his pulling power, with new figures showing almost four million viewers departing the X Factor since he was previously on the show four years ago.
The show boss bowed out after the 2010 series to launch a US version, but returned this year with hopes that his comeback would give viewing figures a boost.
However, overnight figures for last night's edition show a huge drop compared to the equivalent sixth programme of the series during his previous stint as head judge.
At this stage in 2010, the show drew an average audience of 11.6 million on ITV. Last night on the channel, the sixth edition had 7.9 million viewers - a drop of 3.7 million.
Adding in viewing on ITV's catch-up +1 channel boosts Sunday night's figures to 8.5 million, although the channel did not routinely give out such figures four years ago, making it difficult to compare.
Many had put the decline of the show's fortunes on the departure of Cowell and fellow judge Cheryl Fernandez-Versini (formerly Cole), but figures since their return suggest they have not lured viewers back.
Last year the sixth edition of the show was more than a million viewers higher at 9.6 million, including +1 viewers. It is also down on 2012 when the same show had an audience of nine million, again including the viewers of the catch-up programme.
However, there was some comfort for ITV bosses from last night as the programme was almost a million up on the Sunday edition a week earlier, which had an average audience of 7.6 million, although that show had competition from rival programme Strictly Come Dancing when they had a head-to-head clash.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article