We took the first tentative steps towards rebuilding our share portfolios on Wednesday amid signs the stock market is beginning to stabilise after its recent battering.
In total we splashed out £5000 from our notional cash reserves with five new investments to replace some of those lost through disposals over the past few weeks. This left us with £18,000 as a safety net against another downwards lurch in the FTSE 100 share index.
Two of the new recommendations have joined our lacklustre 2014 portfolio which slipped into overall losses for the first time last week.
Belhaven Brewery drinks group Greene King has underperformed for much of the past year as a result of the slowdown in consumer spending, but could enjoy a re-rating through its planned acquisition of Spirit Group which opens up new avenues for its drinks portfolio.
In contrast, logistics group Wincanton has seen its shares hit new peaks ahead of a trading update on November 5, but could have further to go as falling fuel prices and an improved balance sheet bring forward the timing of its return to the dividend list.
Global advertising giant WPP has languished in our 2013 portfolio, but it could be a bargain at current lower prices and we have added it to the 2012 selections in hope of a boost from the strengthening US economy.
Similarly, Saga proved a disappointment when we bought shares on its flotation but now looks an altogether better investment after a 17% fall in the share price and we have taken a fresh punt on the shares for the 2011 portfolio.
AstraZeneca is at last showing signs of recovering from disappointment over a failed takeover and we have added the shares to the 2013 list in belief that fellow investors are still underestimating the strength of its drugs pipeline, along with the impact of a stronger dollar.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article