A SCOTTISH Government consultation launched yesterday will significantly reduce the overall area of farmland in Scotland affected by restrictions on nitrate use.
Areas most at risk of surface water and groundwater being polluted through nitrates are designated as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs). They are subject to an Action Programme that restricts farming operations such as slurry spreading and the use of nitrate fertilisers.
The consultation proposes that, based on water quality measurements, geology, land use and other factors, the NVZ map for Scotland should be redrawn.
Currently 14.2% of Scotland is designated as NVZ in four areas. They are: Moray, Aberdeenshire, Banff and Buchan - Strathmore and Fife - Lothian and Borders -Lower Nithsdale. The consultation recommends the removal of areas affecting 35 groundwater bodies across these four NVZs, with the proposal that an area centred on Finavon be added to the Strathmore and Fife NVZ. The consultation also gives consideration to creating a new NVZ area around Piltanton Burn, near Stranraer.
Any changes at Fainavon and Piltanton are not proposed to take effect until autumn 2015 - 18 months from now.
NFU Scotland vice-president Allan Bowie said: "After years of lobbying for a more proportionate approach to NVZ designation, NFUS welcomes the Scottish Government's proposal to lift a significant number of Scottish farmers out of NVZ restrictions. That will be appreciated by many producers. We have always argued robust, scientific evidence must be the defining element in NVZ designation. The new methodology is more robust and is to be welcomed."
Meanwhile, beef producers will begin to receive their share of £22m from the Scottish Beef Scheme next week. The money will begin to arrive in farmers' bank accounts from Thursday, and it is expected that 95% of producers will have been paid by Wednesday, April 23.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article