RESEARCHERS have confirmed that pyrethroid-resistant cabbage stem flea beetles are present in the UK.
This information is vital for oilseed rape growers who are already sowing crops following this year's early harvest.
Work carried out by Rothamsted Research shows that knock down resistance (KDR) is in populations of cabbage stem flea beetle.
KDR usually confers moderate resistance to all pyrethroids applied at recommended field rates.
Following the restriction on neonicotinoid seed treatments, controlling cabbage stem flea beetle will be reliant on pyrethroid insecticides, so control may be more challenging this year.
According to Caroline Nicholls of HGCA: "Samples for testing were sent in mainly from the South East, so we don't know how widespread the resistant populations are.
"It is therefore possible that the KDR mutation is localised making resistance management a priority this autumn.
"Close monitoring will be crucial this season and the presence of KDR is an added complication. It is therefore essential to only apply a pyrethroid spray where it is absolutely necessary in order to prevent the spread of resistance.
"Research from ADAS has shown that oilseed rape can cope with severe shot holing even at the cotyledon stage.
"This demonstrates that the crop is most vulnerable at emergence where any damage to the growing tip can be lethal. It is this type of damage, at emergence, that can wipe out an entire crop."
It is prohibited to use pyrethroids on bare soil, so the spray window for treating at emergence is quite narrow.
There are no set spray thresholds at emergence, but monitoring local pest pressure will give an indication of whether it is necessary.
The appearance of KDR underlines that good establishment and a fast getaway for the crop is more important than ever given the reduced number and efficacy of pesticides.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article