SCOTTISH farmers' share of the retail price of beef is at its lowest level for almost five years.
Farm-gate prices for beef cattle hit record levels in November last year, but have tumbled dramatically by almost £250 per head in the past eight months. Current price levels mean that those currently finishing cattle for the market are likely to be struggling to break even.
Retail figures show that the average price for beef on shop shelves sat at 557p per kg at the start of 2010 and had risen steadily to 709p per kg by July of this year. However, the farmers' share of the retail price has, in the past year, fallen from 62 per cent to less than 48 per cent.
Given that supermarkets are now securing a far greater share of the margins from beef, the National Farmers Union of Scotland (NFUS) has called on them to act more responsibly or risk undermining future supplies.
NFUS president Nigel Miller said: "For the primary producer to receive less than half the retail value of beef is totally unacceptable given the amount of time, cost and risk taken on by Scottish beef farmers in getting this premium product to market.
"From conception to being ready for the market, a beef animal's journey can take over three years. Compare that lengthy commitment with the meat maturing for three to four weeks in an abattoir then spending two or three days on the shop shelf.
"It was inevitable that farm-gate prices would adjust from the historic highs seen just under a year ago, but we have concerns that the price correction is now being exploited by retailers - using lower prices for cattle and higher retail prices to consumers to squeeze more margin out of the market for themselves.
"That margin grab is a double-edged sword. Figures show that the public expenditure on beef is broadly static. Given that retail prices are going up, that means the public are taking home less beef. It would be a far more positive approach were retailers to use that increased margin to more fairly reward producers at the sharp end and more actively promote Scotch beef to the consumer to help grow the market."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article