Reforms to the Scottish Parliament's committee system are much needed.
Holyrood's committees were seen as a great success in the early years of devolution. Indeed in many ways they have been. They have brought government much closer to the people of Scotland, giving experts and ordinary people from all sorts of backgrounds - science, business, health, communities and charities among them - the chance to speak directly to those in power.
This is immensely valuable for both sides, and when it works it should ensure that better laws are passed, having been scrutinised by better-informed politicians.
But there have been significant problems in recent years. Labour's Hugh Henry identified a "cult" of obedience and slavishness in his coruscating attack on the Public Audit Committee in May.
The SNP-dominated committee had held back on criticising the Scottish Government, he claimed, forcing a minority report to be issued. Similar concerns have been expressed about other committees, which have been accused of refusing to call witnesses hostile to government policy, or acting to shield ministers from criticism.
The proposals from presiding officer Tricia Marwick for reform of the system are therefore very timely.
It may be, as Ms Marwick insists, that her proposals are not a direct response to the growing concern over politicisation of committees.
But there is evidence of a failure of MSPs to understand their duty as committee members to scrutinise proposals and impartially hold the government of the day to account.
It is essentially a lack of maturity. This is a young legislature still. Westminster, with all its history, has built up a strong tradition of robust and effective committees, whose members pride themselves on the job of committee work, and keeping it at a remove from party affiliation.
Scotland's parliament and its parliamentarians have not yet established the same tradition. But without a second chamber to fall back on, Holyrood arguably needs robust committees far more than the House of Commons. Electing conveners by secret ballot could go a long way to ensuring those chosen are the independently-minded MSPs seen to understand this concept and who have the clout to defend their committees.
A mandate from the Scottish Parliament would emphasise they have a responsibility to that parliament as well as their party, and the dual role they need to play. MSPs must realise that it is in nobody's interests to allow the Holyrood committee system to become politicised through slavish party tribalism.
Ms Marwick's proposals are not foolproof. If a party has a large majority it is hard to see how its members could be prevented from electing pliant conveners, or how such conveners could be held to account once chosen. But it would make this a much less likely scenario.
These changes are vital if the committee system is to justify its reputation as the Scottish Parliament's "jewel in the crown".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article