It was Vladimir Lenin who once famously said that "the purpose of terrorism is to terrorise." Few doubt that the gunning down in a Moscow Street of Boris Nemtsov, one of Russia's most outspoken opposition leaders, was aimed at doing just that.
But if Nemtsov's death had the purpose of creating terror, the question that follows is just who wanted to create it? Nemtsov was one of the few major Russian political figures who has dared to criticise President Vladimir Putin's annexation of Crimea and Moscow's support for the separatists in eastern Ukraine. That his death came just two days before he was set to lead one of the largest opposition rallies against the Moscow's support for the separatists has led some to speculate that the gunmen may have come from their ranks. Frankly though, its hard to imagine the separatists would have dared such an act without explicit permission from the Kremlin.
That alone has given rise to some speculation those very separatists might have been behind Nemtsov's death. Frankly though, its hard to imagine that they would have dared such an act without explicit permission from the Kremlin
been enough to raise speculation
That his death came just two days before he was set to lead one of the largest opposition rallies in Russia to protest the Kremlin only adds to the belief shared by many that the hand of Vladimir Putin was behind Nemtsov's killing.
promised the mother of murdered opposition politician Boris Nemtsov on Saturday that everything will be done to find and punish her son's killers
One of Russia's most outspoken opposition leaders, Boris Nemtsov, was fatally shot on the streets of Moscow the night of Feb. 27 - two days before he was set to lead one of the largest opposition rallies in Russia to protest the Kremlin
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article