AS the dust settles from the referendum, it has revealed some remarkable political changes.
The parties of the losing side have emerged dazed but clutching an unexpected consolation prize in the form of surging membership, with the Greens and Socialists both tripling in size, and the SNP well on their way to following suit.
Responding to such sudden, profound change will be challenging, but it is a headache every other political party in the UK must envy.
Meanwhile, the winners on September 18 have every reason to fear rather than relish the future.
The polls suggest the LibDems will sink even lower in the public's estimation at next May's General Election.
The Tories will continue to bleed support to Ukip.
The defection of a second MP to Nigel Farage's anti-EU party feels like only the start.
And in Labour, with Ed Miliband still failing to click with voters after four years as leader, there is foreboding, worsened by rejection in former party strongholds in the referendum.
As we report today, Scottish Labour are now embarking on a review to improve their internal operations which will look at MP selection and one-member, one-vote for leadership contests.
If that sounds familiar, it is because Scottish Labour also had a review after the 2011 Holyrood election which resulted in what was promoted as far greater autonomy for the Scottish party.
However, as the referendum illustrated, Labour at Westminster still call the shots, with Gordon Brown and Douglas Alexander elbowing aside Johann Lamont in the final months.
Changing rules is not the same as changing a culture, and it is its myopic, introspective culture of compulsive squabbling and voter neglect that has long been Labour's problem.
The electoral mauling they now face in Scotland is very much of their own making.
With debates over devolution running hot across the UK, party loyalties in flux, a knife-edge election imminent and a possible EU referendum after it, we are entering a momentous period.
It is fortunate that the referendum has given Scotland such politically aware citizens.
That vote was only the beginning.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article