WE are still a month from the general election and the formation of the next government, but Nicola Sturgeon has already shown she can make Whitehall dance to her tune.
After she demanded an inquiry into the leak of an inaccurate account of her meeting with the French Ambassador, the Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood promptly ordered one.
The Ambassador and French consul-general also rushed out supportive statements.
If she can make the wheels of other governments spin this fast before the election, imagine the influence she could exert with a large group of SNP MPs in a hung parliament.
The source of this clumsy smear attempt remains unclear.
The central claim, that Sturgeon told the Ambassador she would prefer David Cameron to Ed Miliband as Prime Minister, appears to have been written by a Scotland Office official in good faith after a call from the French consul-general in Edinburgh.
The sceptical scribe even included a hefty caveat: "I have to admit I'm not sure that the FM's tongue would be quite so loose. It might well be a case of something being lost in translation."
The Telegraph then reported what was a genuine, if inaccurate, memo.
The paper was certainly over-eager to run a scoop damaging the SNP and should have carried out more checks, but the material was authentic, even if the information contained in it was false.
The real mischief took place with the leaking of the memo.
Labour would have been the most obvious beneficiaries had it been true.
It has already claimed the SNP and Tories are in an "unholy alliance", the former wrecking Labour to keep Cameron in power - the ideal backdrop for a new independence referendum.
A memo proving that Sturgeon privately wanted Cameron in power would have been a godsend in seats where Labour supporters are switching to the SNP.
But in opposition Labour should not have access to such restricted memos.
It also seems perverse that the Conservatives should leak a document helpful to Labour.
Hence the suspicion falling on the LibDems, who are also threatened by an SNP surge.
Wherever the leak originated it shows somebody, somewhere is panicking.
And just as happened during the referendum, that fear is leading to dirty tricks.
Sturgeon's opponents are right to worry.
Her performance on last week's ITV leaders' debate showed her strengths to a new audience and they liked it.
One reason was her focus on values and hope, not scapegoating and austerity.
She presented an alternative not only to the Westminster old boys' network, but to the timid managerialism that has sucked the life out of UK politics and alienated voters.
Above all, she embodied what Westminster fears most - change.
But change is coming whether Westminster likes it or not.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article