ONE of Scotland's most senior police officers has said tens of millions of pounds worth of savings in policing over the next three years are unachievable.
Chief Constable Kevin Smith, the president of the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (Acpos), warned the pressure to make £88 million of cuts could hit plans to merge the current eight forces into a single Scottish Police Authority from April 2013.
Mr Smith is the first senior figure to say the plan, which aims to make a total of £1.5 billion of cuts over 15 years, is not possible. He said the service is keen to make the changes but believes the timeframe to be impossible.
He also criticised, during evidence to Holyrood's Justice Committee, the suggestion in the Bill to set up the force that ministers would be able to "direct" the new chief constable.
The written evidence from Acpos states: "We believe certain provisions within the Bill threaten the operational independence of the Chief Constable and, thereby, policing.
"The Scottish Government's position is ministerial directions are used rarely and ... policing can be no different from other Government departments. In a democratic society it not only must be separate from Government, it must be seen to be separate.
"We believe the power of ministerial direction ... if it is to remain, needs to be more fully articulated and described, and appropriate caveats placed thereon, to ensure it cannot result in an unintended consequence of ministerial direction of the Chief Constable."
The £88m of cuts by 2014/15 are due to rise to £106m in the following spending review in 2015/16. In the next three years, £50m of the cuts would come from police staff, with the loss of an anticipated 2000 police staff.
Mr Smith said the figures were based on an "outline" and not a full business case from the police. He added that, at the time, there was no specific time-scale and no constraints such as the stipulation there be no compulsory redundancies.
Mr Smith said: "It is not the case we don't want to do this but if we follow the law and due process it makes it impossible.
"The first occasion we will be a legal entity is April 1, 2013. That is the first occasion the new chief and authority will have to start this process.
"The savings equate to around 2000 people. We will not attract that number of volunteers. It is not a lack of commitment but we will not have enough people go from the service. We will not deliver the savings if we follow due process."
David O'Connor, president of the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (ASPS) said: "The biggest challenge is maintaining force delivery and public confidence but we need to maintain staff confidence and morale and that means having the right balance of police staff and officers."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Acpos has assured ministers it is fully committed to developing and implementing the Police Reform Programme within the overall profile of investment and savings laid out in the Spending Review.
"The Scottish Government made additional money available for police and fire reform during the spending review period from 2012/13 onwards and we are in discussions with Acpos as to how this will be spent.
"Our outline business case sets out how our target of £106m annual savings after five years could be achieved. These savings don't start until year three of the current spending review period.
"The Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Bill improves accountability for policing and makes it clear the Chief Constable is accountable to the Scottish Police Authority and not ministers.
"It also provides strong safeguards to ensure ministers cannot control or direct the authority or the Chief Constable to do anything relating to specific police operations."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article