RADICAL cleric Abu Qatada cannot be sent back to Jordan because it would be a "flagrant denial of justice", human rights judges ruled.
The firebrand preacher, below, described as "Osama bin Laden's right-hand man in Europe", won his appeal to the European Court of Human Rights against the UK's efforts to deport him with assurances that he would not be tortured.
Home Secretary Theresa May said she was "disappointed" but it was "not the end of the road" and Qatada would remain in prison while "all legal options" are considered". The judges ruled sending him back to face terror charges could lead to evidence obtained by torture being used against him, denying him his right to a fair trial.
It is the first time the Strasbourg-based court has found that an expulsion would be in violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to a fair trial, which is enshrined in UK law under the Human Rights Act.
The Government can now make a final attempt to appeal against the judgment before it becomes binding in three months' time.
Qatada featured in hate sermons found on videos in the flat of one of the 9/11 bombers.
Law Lords ruled almost three years ago that he could be sent back to Jordan, but he appealed to the court in Strasbourg.
It means the 51-year-old must stay in Britain, where he is currently held at Long Lartin high-security prison in Worcestershire.
Human rights group Liberty called for Qatada to be tried for terrorism in the UK "without further delay".
Qatada, who came to Britain in 1993 on a forged passport, was released on bail in the summer of 2008 but returned to prison later that year over fears he would try to abscond.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article