There are plans to provide greater protection to Culloden Battlefield from any plans for nearby housing, by extending the designated conservation area round the historic site.
It follows calls for the Scottish Government to intervene in a row last year over new housing within half a mile of the iconic location
Up to 2000 men are thought to lie beneath Culloden Moor having fallen when the Jacobite dream ended there in April 1746, changing the course of British history.
In 2013 Highland Council initially refused Inverness Properties' plan for the development at Viewhill Farm about half a mile from the battlefield. But, following an appeal by the developers, a Scottish Government-appointed reporter said planning permission should be granted with conditions. The houses haven't yet been built, but many feel more should be done to prevent any further threat to the site.
Next week Highland councillors will consider plans for a the first "substantial" review of the existing conservation areas for Culloden Battlefield and Culloden House since they were first designated in 1968.
If the designated conservation area round the battlefield is extended, it would change the rights to build which would normally be permitted under planning control. It would also mean that planning permission would be required for existing houses anting to install satellite dishes, build walls and fences or alter windows and doors.
The National Trust for Scotland (NTS), which manages the battlefield, had objected to the housing plan and an NTS spokesman welcomed the proposed review of the conservation within the Highland Council. "Clearly if it had been in place before,we wouldn't have had this proposed development at Viewhill Farm," he said.
The Stop Development at Culloden campaign group, which gathered more than 16,000 signatures on a petition against the houses last year, has also been delighted by the news:
Founder George Kempik said Culloden Battlefield was famous all over the world and people everywhere had been concerned at the Viewhill housing plans."We are delighted that the old conservation area is now considered out of date and is planned to be extended," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article