A HEALTH inspectors' leader last night called for a public inquiry into the Legionnaires' disease outbreak that has killed two and now hit 91 people.
Cases rose again yesterday in Scotland's worst outbreak in decades as Tom Bell, chief executive of the Royal Environmental Health Institute of Scotland, made the call amid mounting political pressure for a more proactive testing programme for cooling towers – the suspected source.
Twelve victims have now engaged lawyers over negligence claims.
Mr Bell said: "There has to be an inquiry. Two people have died; other people might have long-term debilitating effects.
He said it should seek to establish "what happened, who did it and could it have been prevented".
"There clearly has been some kind of negligence."
Gordon Erasmuson, 59, who became ill with Legionella on May 30, backed the call after claiming he got the bug purely by leaving his window open in the Edinburgh outbreak zone.
The retired carpenter said: "I live about 300 metres from one of these plants [suspected as the source] and I usually keep my window open during the summer.
"You can actually smell the odours coming from this place.
"This should never have happened. It should have been tested either internally or by inspectors."
Meanwhile, it was reported two sites served with improvement notices, North British Distillery and MacFarlan Smith, had not been checked by external inspectors for two years.
Three sites have been served with such notices – the third is the National Museum of Scotland complex in Chambers Street – but health chiefs said the actions did not indicate the sites were the source.
There are now 44 victims and the total number of suspected cases remains unchanged at 47.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article