UP TO 5000 people are still complaining each week to the financial ombudsman about payment protection insurance, new figures show.
Two-thirds (67 per cent) of all new complaints received by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) between May and June were about PPI. Last year, the ombudsman service said it was dealing with 12,000 complaints a week about PPI, although the number of gripes it is dealing with about this type of insurance is still 50% higher than in 2012.
PPI is the most complained about product that the FOS, which resolves disputes between consumers and fin-ancial firms, has ever seen.
PPI was added to people's loans and credit card agreements without them fully understanding what it was or realising it was there. Such policies aim to help people repay debts if they become ill or lose their job although, in many cases, they were unsuitable for the people who took them out.
Some 56,869 complaints were made about PPI during April, May and June, according to the FOS.
About 61% of PPI cases are being upheld in favour of the consumer, lower than the 65% average during the last couple of years.
The service said it is seeing cases which involve policies sold in a wider range of contexts than before, often making the outcome less clear cut. It is also increasingly being asked to step in at a later stage of a dispute, including cases where it is the settlement, not the mis-sale, that is the point of disagreement.
According to the Financial Conduct Authority's website, £15.1 billion has been paid out over PPI since January 2011.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article