CAMPAIGNERS have lodged a petition of more than 900 signatures calling on Glasgow City Council not to banish its statues as part of the proposed revamp of George Square.
The petition, called "Save Our Statues, Save our Square" and collected in November and December, accuses the council of paying lip service to a public consultation and compares the statuary to the collection at civic museums.
It also says the category A-listing of each individual statue is an acknowledgement of their international importance.
The plans for the £15 million revamp are currently in disarray, with a decision on the winning design scheduled for next week. However, senior council insiders have cast doubt on the prospect of any of the six being selected.
The council expects to remove all of the statues in due course, at least temporarily.
Campaigner Ann Laird said: "The petition signatories, angry at the staggering lip- service to consultation, are calling for the council to hold a public meeting.
"Scottish planning legislation requires a 12-week pre-application consultation about proposals for a block of 50 flats.
"Where large or significant developments don't happen to qualify for this, developers are advised to hold a voluntary consultation, fully open to the public. Sadly, it seems the city doesn't follow its own advice."
Fellow campaigner Linda Mawson said "We are not dinosaurs and we do want to see George Square improved, but let's do it in a properly considered manner.
"This petition has been handed into the City Chambers simply for the attention of council leader Gordon Matheson."
Green councillor Martha Wardrop: "At a recent committee meeting I raised a series of questions and requested a six-week public consultation before the design brief was finalised.
"This request feel on deaf ears but I hope this can be agreed as a way forward."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article