Harry Potter author JK Rowling has returned to the world of her teenage wizard to explain the background of one of her most evil characters.
She has written more than 5,500 words for her Pottermore website going into the history of Azkaban prison and the story of Dolores Umbridge - a witch played in the films by Imelda Staunton.
Rowling explains that Umbridge, who tormented the teenage wizard as a teacher at Hogwarts, is based on a real person whom she "disliked intensely on sight".
She said: "The woman in question returned my antipathy with interest. Why we took against each other so instantly, heartily and (on my side, at least) irrationally, I honestly cannot say."
Rowling said Umbridge was "one of the characters for whom I feel the purest dislike", adding: "Her desire to control, to punish, and to inflict pain, all in the name of law and order, are, I think, every bit as reprehensible as Lord Voldemort's unvarnished espousal of evil."
She has previously used the website to update the Potter stories and offer fans a glimpse into the lives of her characters after the books ended.
In one, she wrote about a school reunion that saw a now 34-year-old Harry back at Hogwarts with "threads of silver" in his black hair and a mysterious cut over his cheekbone which signifies his membership of a top-secret group of wizards called the Aurors.
The author, who lives in Edinburgh, recently published her second crime thriller under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith.
The real identity of Robert Galbraith was revealed last year and sent the first novel, The Cuckoo's Calling, to the top of the book charts.
She accepted a substantial donation to charity from the law firm which breached her confidentiality by revealing she was writing under a pseudonym.
Only a handful of trusted advisers, family and friends were initially aware of Galbraith's true identity until the story made headlines worldwide.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article