Vienna has been named as the city with the best quality of living in the world while Dublin came in 34th place and London was ranked at number 40.
The study, by Mercer, evaluated living conditions in more than 440 cities worldwide, including their political, cultural and social environments, education systems, health considerations, recreation and housing.
Zurich came in second place with Auckland in third position. London was the highest-ranking UK city, trailing behind places such as Paris, Oslo, Berlin, Melbourne, Singapore and Barcelona.
Birmingham was placed jointly at number 52 on the list, alongside Rome.
Glasgow was at joint number 55 with Philadelphia in the US while Aberdeen was at number 57. Belfast was placed at number 63, sandwiched between two places in the US - Dallas at number 62 and Houston at 64.
The survey was carried out to help multi-national companies and other employers compensate employees fairly when placing them on international assignments.
"UK cities overall enjoy high standards of quality of living and remain stable and attractive locations for businesses," said Ellyn Karetnick, leader of Mercer's international mobility practice in the UK.
"Security has been tightened in many major European cities following the attacks in Paris and Copenhagen, and Mercer is closely monitoring any potential impact on the living standard for expatriates and their families in these locations."
Here are the worldwide rankings of the top 10 cities with the best quality of life, according to Mercer:
1. Vienna, Austria
2. Zurich, Switzerland
3. Auckland, New Zealand
4. Munich, Germany
5. Vancouver, Canada
6. Dusseldorf, Germany
7. Frankfurt, Germany
8. Geneva, Switzerland
9. Copenhagen, Denmark
10. Sydney, Australia
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article