Why do humans have two eyes?
Why do many animals have stripes? And should poetry be difficult to understand?
These are the types of questions students hoping to study at Oxford University can expect to face at interview.
The institution has published a sample of the brain-teasers posed by tutors in an attempt to give an insight into its selection process.
It comes just days before the deadline for would-be students to submit applications to the university.
Oxford's director of undergraduate admissions, Mike Nicholson, said the interview questions were a chance for potential students to show their abilities, and to think for themselves rather than recite facts.
Youngsters hoping to study biological sciences could be faced with the question "Why do many animals have stripes?"
St Anne's College interviewer Martin Speight said the question aims to get applicants to think about biological topics, and then to consider them in the context of successful adaptations to life on earth.
English students could be asked to discuss Harry Potter author JK Rowling's move to writing for adults, while those hoping to study history could be asked how much of the past could be discovered if the only records that existed related to sport.
History interviewer Stephen Tick of Pembroke College said: "I would say this to a candidate who had mentioned an interest in sport on their personal statement, though it could equally be applied to an interest in something else – like film, drama or music.
"What I would be looking for is to see how the candidate might use their imagination."
The deadline for applying to Oxford for admission next year is October 15.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article