EDINBURGH council officials are considering taking legal action over tram works carried out on Leith Walk that will require extended road closures to repair.
Traders on the thoroughfare are braced for further disruption as utility diversions that were supposed to be completed ahead of track-laying are fixed – even though they will now not benefit from the tram line, which has been terminated in the city centre to save money.
The Herald understands that legal officers at City of Edinburgh Council have been asked to explore if any action can be taken against Carillion, the utility firm that won the contract to divert underground pipes and cables along the 11-mile original tram route from Edinburgh Airport to Newhaven Harbour.
Around £1 million is due to be spent employing a new contractor to repair faults and complete utility diversions on Leith Walk, mostly involving Scottish Water mains.
A senior council source said: "Councillors are aware that the utilities had not been done properly and we're now looking at pursuing the people who originally did the work."
The dispute has emerged as Edinburgh's Labour/SNP coalition are considering increasing the £3.2m that was made available last year to restore Leith Walk to its pre-tram state and combining the reinstatement works with the utility repairs to cut down on disruption.
The corridor was left with temporary road surfaces and junctions in December 2009 when the initial utility work was completed ahead of the track-laying phase.
Lesley Hinds, the council's transport convenor, said: "We want to make Leith Walk a thriving, attractive place for people who live there and want to shop there. We're looking at extra resources for that as the £3.2m will not be a substantial enough sum."
Asked about the dispute with Carillion, she added: "The council is looking at the options regarding the condition of the works that were left by the previous contractor. "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article