A MAJOR rail terminus could be built in central Scotland to deal with new high-speed train services to London over the next two decades.
The idea of a new station between Glasgow and Edinburgh has been floated by Infrastructure Secretary Alex Neil, who told MSPs it could act as a "hub" to access other areas in the central belt and beyond.
Industry experts have identified a need for new stations to be built in both cities, if the high-speed rail network being developed in England is extended to Scotland following completion of a first phase between London and Birmingham in 2026.
However, Mr Neil yesterday told the Scottish Parliament's Infrastructure Committee that Government officials were looking at options to locate a new station between the cities.
In response to an apparently light-hearted question by Jamie Hepburn, MSP, on building a new station near his Cumbernauld and Kilsyth constituency, Mr Neil said: "What some transport experts are suggesting is that it would be beneficial to have some kind of central Scotland terminus, as it were, because from there you could go north, you could go west, you could go east, you could go to places south of Scotland. So these are the kind of discussions we are going to be taking forward as part of our own investment plan."
Industry studies have suggested that, by 2026, both Glasgow Central and Edinburgh Waverley will have no further capacity to expand to accommodate additional high-speed rail services.
Glasgow City Council has allocated land in the east end of the city for a new rail terminus and it is thought Haymarket would be the most likely site for an expanded station in Edinburgh – preventing the need for extra tunnelling to access Waverley.
The idea of a central Scotland terminus received a mixed response from transport experts, who emphasised the importance of a rail journey that penetrated into the heart of the country's two biggest cities.
Jim Steer, founder of the influential Greengauge 21 lobby group for high-speed rail, said: "I think it would be more appealing for people living in Scotland than people visiting. If you're living in a residential area of the central belt, it would be just as handy as going into Waverley.
"If, on the other hand, you think of people visiting Edinburgh or Glasgow it sort of puts it back in the 'why not fly' category because you still have got to get a connecting train at the end of your journey."
Professor Iain Docherty, a former non-executive director of Transport Scotland, said it would be possible to build a central terminus if constructing a Y or T-shaped network that would serve both Glasgow and Edinburgh along separate branch lines.
"The whole point of high-speed rail is point-to-point journeys. A lot of the economic case is based on business travel and there are lots of high-value jobs in the city centre. That's where you want to access," he said.
The idea was given short shrift by officials in Network Rail, the privatised company responsible for running the UK railways. A source at the company said: "There's no point having a high-speed train that brings people essentially to the middle of nowhere, then punting them on to conventional rail to complete their journeys."
A spokeswoman for Transport Scotland said: "We are considering a range of possibilities including the hub station option. The most viable options will then be considered for further analysis and this work will feed into our discussions with the Department for Transport."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article