Rail season tickets could be 10 percent cheaper by 2017 if services were run by the public sector instead of private firms, according to new research.
Action for Rail, which is to stage a demonstration at Glasgow Central station today (tue), said its research had found savings of £1.5 billion could be made over the next few years if lines were brought back into public ownership.
The group said passengers would benefit from the massive fare savings if money was recouped from the amount privatised rail operators give to shareholders, claiming £520 million could be saved in shareholder dividends over the coming years.
Tonight (tue), the first Caledonian Sleeper services to be run by Serco will begin operating followed tomorrow (wed) by Dutch operator Abellio's take over of the ScotRail network. Both were previously operated by FirstGroup.
At the start of the month, the East Coast route was taken over by Virgin-Stagecoach, having been in state ownership since 2009.
Action for Rail added that commuters on the UK's privatised railways could be spending more than twice as much of their salary on rail travel as passengers on state-owned services in France, Germany, Spain and Italy.
The day of action is taking place at more than 40 UK stations.
TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady, who chairs Action for Rail, said: "The UK has the most expensive rail fares in all of Europe. If services were run by the public sector, it would make a big difference to families and hard-pressed commuters, who have suffered year after year of wage-busting fare increases under privatised rail."
"This report highlights once again the huge cost of privatisation to taxpayers and passengers. Money that could be spent on making journeys cheaper is instead being siphoned off into shareholders' pockets and wasted on bidding and other franchising costs."
A spokesman for the Rail Delivery Group, which represents Network Rail and train operators, said the group's figures should be taken with a 'pinch of salt' as five times as much money now comes into public coffers from operators, compared to the 1990s.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article