Burundians have voted for a new parliament after a night of sporadic blasts and gunshots, and weeks of violent protests against President Pierre Nkurunziza's decision to seek a third term in office.
Voting appeared slow in an election boycotted by the opposition and condemned by African and European nations as lacking the conditions to ensure it was fair. "We don't see many people," said one diplomat.
The EU, a major donor, has threatened to withhold more funds to the aid-reliant nation after Burundi ignored UN and African calls for a postponement for the parliamentary vote, and a presidential election on July 15.
Opponents say the president's bid to stand again breaks the constitution. But the government has pressed on with plans for both votes, amid the worst political crisis since an ethnically charged civil war ended in 2005.
More than 125,000 people, or over 1 per cent of the nation's 10 million population, have fled across the border, causing concern in a region with a history of ethnic conflict, particularly next-door Rwanda which suffered genocide in 1994.
Aimable Niyonkuru, 20, once a supporter of Nkurunziza's CNDD-FDD party, said he would not vote because the president had not improved the economy or delivered on other promises.
"I am really disappointed about what all politicians are doing, I think that they are not patriotic," he said.
A presidential spokesman said voting was proceeding smoothly and said African and European states could not judge the process before it was completed. He said any further delay in the votes was "out of the question".
The president cites a court ruling saying he can run for a third term and has refused to back down.
Sounds of shooting and at least two blasts were heard overnight in the capital Bujumbura, the focus of clashes between demonstrators and police.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article