Scottish politicians have condemned a remark by the leader of one of Northern Ireland's main parties which appeared to compare the SNP and Irish terrorists.
Ulster Unionist leader Tom Elliott claimed in a column the party posed a greater threat to the Union "than the violence of the IRA".
Labour MSP Michael McMahon said the comments were "palpable nonsense and an insult to the common sense of the Scottish people".
Comparisons between the constitutional question in Scotland and the Troubles in Ireland "did not fit easily", he said. The row comes just days after Northern Irish politicians took exception to a remark by Alex Salmond which appeared to compare the move towards a Scottish independence referendum and Ireland's struggle before partition.
Mr Elliott, who leads the second-largest unionist party in Northern Ireland, wrote that the province had endured a "30-year terrorist campaign designed to break the will of the unionist people".
He wrote: "With Northern Ireland's position within the Union having been secured, it is rather ironic the constitutional approach of Alex Salmond appears to pose a greater threat to the union than the violence of the IRA."
Mr Elliott also accused the SNP of planning to play on a "19th-century romantic-style notion of nationalism" in an opinion column in the Belfast Telegraph newspaper.
A senior SNP source said: "We need serious discussion of the issues not comparisons to the IRA".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article