Discussions have taken place between British and American officials over the use of UK bases in the event of military action against Iran, Downing Street has indicated.
No 10 refused to be drawn on reports that the Government had rebuffed a plea by the US for its forces to be allowed to use bases in Britain as well as in Cyprus and on Ascension Island in the Atlantic and Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to support the military build-up in the Gulf.
However, a spokeswoman confirmed the issue of the bases – which have been used by the US in the past, including during the invasion of Iraq – had been raised in discussions between officials.
"Contingency planning is something which we do as a matter of routine," the spokeswoman said.
"Obviously we are working closely, for example with the United States, as we have done in the past, regarding the use of UK bases. We routinely speak to our counterparts in the United States. "
It was reported by a national newspaper that US diplomats have been sounding out British officials about the use of the bases.
They were said to have received a cool response from the British, who cited legal advice from the office of the Attorney General, Dominic Grieve, that a pre-emptive military strike against Iran would be illegal under international law.
The paper quoted a senior Whitehall source as saying: "It is explicit. The Government has been using this to push back against the Americans."
The US was said to have been "surprised" by the reluctance of UK ministers to provide assurances of this kind of "upfront assistance".
A spokeswoman for No 10 said the Government was still committed to resolving the stand-off over Iran's nuclear programme through a combination of sanctions and diplomatic engagement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article