SCOTS will pay a price in reduced power and influence in Westminster if they vote No, veteran Quebec independence experts have warned.
The "nation within Canada" is the only place in the world to ever reject independence at the ballot box - in 1980 and 1995.
However, campaigners and experts believe the two referendum defeats weakened the province's government by losing it the biggest bargaining chip it ever had: the very threat of a vote on breaking away.
Alain-G Gagnon, professor of political science at the University of Quebec in Montreal, said: "People need to be aware, if you go for a referendum, if you lose it you will have to pay a price. You can't lose the referendum and not lose something else.
"Scots should be advised that the centre always wants to protect itself. Even if they say they want to consider some devo max, forget it. They will say, 'No, we shall not give them more power, look what they have done with the power they have'. They will say 'If we give them more power, there'll be a slippery slope there'. Their strategy will be to limit the power of Holyrood."
Quebecers solidly supported their federation with Canada in 1980 on the promise of more powers that - independence campaigners argue - failed to materialise. The No vote in 1995 was so narrow - the difference was fewer than 50,000 - some thought the narrow victory for No would force concessions, more autonomy. It did not.
Bernard Drainville, a prominent member of Quebec's main independence force, Parti Quebecois echoed Mr Gagnon's views.
He said: "I am of the opinion that the strength of our independence movement determines the bargain power we have with the central government.
"In the same way I am convinced that the strength of the Scottish indy movement is the key determinant of Scotland's bargaining power with London. The fact that there is a strong indy movement gives you the strength to protect your interests, to get the better deal from London."
Mr Drainville added: "Not only did we punish ourselves by saying no to this great idea of founding our own country, but we also weakened ourselves because the rest of Canada kind of assumed that losing makes the future threat of a referendum less credible.
"So my advice to Scots would be: don't miss your chance. The big advantage that Scotland has is its natural resources, its oil, its financial sector. You can manage, you can do it."
And one of Canada's most prominent unionists Senator Dennis Dawson acknowledged that losing a referendum hurt Quebec. But he laid the blame firmly on his opponents for holding the vote in the first place.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article