ED Balls has apparently put a post-general election deal between Labour and the SNP back on the table, just weeks after he ruled a coalition out.
Last month, when the shadow chancellor was asked if an agreement with the Nationalists was a possibility if they take a large number of seats from his party, he replied: "No. And I don't think anybody is suggesting any suggestion of a deal with the SNP at all."
However, despite being repeatedly pressed over whether his party would be willing to strike an agreement with the SNP if, as some polls predict, they will hold the balance of power post-May, he did not take the opportunity to dismiss the possibility.
Nicola Sturgeon has suggested the SNP could prop up a Labour administration on a confidence and supply basis.
Flanked by Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy at a meeting with journalists in Edinburgh, he instead insisted the general election presented voters with a straight choice between the "continued austerity" of the Conservatives' plan or Labour's economic strategy.
Mr Balls said: The danger of voting SNP is that there will be another David Cameron and George Osborne in Downing Street again. The only way to fix our economy is vote for Labour's plan, because unlike the SNP we can actually implement these changes in government. If you don't vote Labour, you'll get the Tories back."
He said he understood the SNP had already ruled out a coalition with Labour, adding: "It is not part of our plan. It is not what we want." Speaking about Ms Sturgeon's plans to lobby for an increase in public spending at Westminster, Mr Balls said: "The SNP plans are not the issue - they are not going to implement any plan. The issue is, is it going to be a Labour plan or a Tory plan."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article