Conservatives shouldn't be welcoming the prospect of a lot of SNP MPs being elected at the expense of Labour in Scotland, Ruth Davidson has said.
The Scottish Conservative leader's comments follow a warning from senior Tory peer Lord Forsyth that building up the SNP to undermine support for Labour in England could ultimately damage the Union.
''We've had the dilemma for Conservatives, which is they want to be the largest party at Westminster and therefore some see the fact that the nationalists are going to take seats in Scotland will be helpful,'' he told the Guardian. ''But that is a short-term and dangerous view which threatens the integrity of our country.''
His intervention came as Sir John Major endorsed warnings by David Cameron about the dangers of a post-election deal between Labour and the SNP.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme, Ms Davidson said: "What the Prime Minister is saying, what I have been saying for months and months, is that doing some sort of dodgy deal between the Labour Party and the SNP is bringing the SNP closer to breaking up Britain.
"Every single thing that the SNP does, whether that's writing white papers full of dodgy facts and figures full of fantasy economics, making up EU legal advice, everything they do is about bringing Scotland closer to independence.
"Putting Ed Miliband in Number 10 is about bringing Scotland closer to independence for them too."
She added: "One of the things I do agree with Lord Forsyth about is that the Tory party shouldn't be welcoming the idea that there is going to be a lot of SNP MPs at Labour's expense.
"I think the problem is that while the Conservative Government has responsibility for many things, 10 years of decline and implosion of the Labour Party in Scotland is not one of them."
She added: "I think Lord Forsyth has fallen into a bit of a nationalist trap by framing this as a Scotland versus England thing, and it is not, because unionists across the whole of the UK are concerned and frightened about the sort of concessions that the SNP being in charge of a weak Labour government could bring."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article