WALES and Northern Ireland cannot afford to be left behind by the talks on giving more powers to Scotland, Paul Murphy, a former Secretary of State for both countries, has warned.
The Labour backbencher's caution came as a report by the think-tank, the Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufacturers and Commerce City Growth Commission, calls for devolution to England's cities, so-called "devo-met".
It argues that allowing the cities to set their own tax, immigration and planning policies alongside devo-max for Scotland could boost UK productivity by £79bn a year - worth approximately five per cent of GDP - by 2030.
In Edinburgh this morning, all five main Scottish parties will meet as part of the Smith Commission process to begin attempts at consensus on which extra powers should be transferred from London to Edinburgh in the wake of the independence referendum result.
As they prepared to do so, Lord McConnell, the former Labour First Minister, warned that a cosy back-room deal would not do, stressing: "This has to be seen as based on principle and stand the test of time."
Mr Murphy insisted it was essential that the administrations in Cardiff and Belfast received fair funding in the wake of any new financial settlement for Scotland.
"It is very important for the other two devolved administrations to talk about what happens in Scotland because we cannot get left behind," declared Mr Murphy.
He said the most pressing issue was finance, in particular the Barnett Formula given that Scotland was likely to receive significant tax powers as well as a commitment that its Barnett funding would not be reduced.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article