Tommy Sheridan, the Scottish socialist leader, was cleared yesterday of causing a breach of the peace at a mass demonstration outside the home of Britain's
Trident nuclear submarine.
The 38-year-old Glasgow MSP had pleaded not guilty to the offence at a mass protest at Faslane naval base on the Clyde on October 22 last year.
During his 40-minute trial at Argyll and Bute District Court in Helensburgh he said he felt he had every right to participate in the demonstration, one which he said was described as ''peaceful and friendly'' by police officers and naval base staff afterwards.
Justice of the Peace John MacPhail dismissed the case, telling the court: ''I am not persuaded there is a sufficiency of evidence.''
Speaking after the verdict, Mr Sheridan said: ''What's vital now is the establishment of the right to peaceful protest as is clear in article 11 of the European Court of Human Rights, which has been incorporated into Scottish law.
''Those who regularly attend Faslane naval base to express their opposition to nuclear weapons quite simply have the legal right to do so.''
He added: ''This is the second not guilty verdict I've received and I'll return with others in April next year to again take part in peaceful protests against these weapons of mass
destruction.''
Mr Sheridan was found not guilty of a similar charge at the same court in October last year, a ruling that is being appealed against. He said it was time for police to stop carrying out mass arrests at peaceful demonstrations like the ones he said he was involved in.
He said yesterday's trial had ''struck a blow'' in favour of the right to peaceful protests, adding that anybody serving a jail sentence for a breach of the peace at a peaceful protest in Scotland should be freed as a result of this case.
Jane Tallents, spokeswoman for Trident Ploughshare, said she hoped Mr Sheridan's verdict would encourage more people to take part in demonstrations against nuclear weapons in the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article