NEW rules on changes to royal titles after divorce were announced yesterday by Buckingham Palace.
But although the proclamation on the authority of the Queen starts with the historic wording ``The Queen has been pleased . . . to declare'', the palace made it clear that no snub to Diana, Princess of Wales is intended by the change or its timing.
The changes, announced in the form of letters patent, are intended to avoid future debates like those which arose over this year's two royal divorces - whether the divorced wives should keep the style of ``Her Royal Highness''.
Like the Duchess of York before her, Diana accepted the loss of the HRH before her name, but only after months of often public debate.
Yesterday she attended her first engagement as Diana, Princess of Wales.
The new rules make it clear that in future, divorced wives of male descendants of the sovereign will not be entitled to use the Royal Highness title.
The letters patent will appear tomorrow's issue of the London Gazette, which is effectively the official Government newspaper of record for a variety of announcements.
Its release yesterday, just hours after the decree absolute in the Waleses' divorce, was decided because legal preparation work had been concluded and it was felt that it was more appropriate for it to coincide with the divorce rather than delay and make an entirely separate announcement, said a palace spokesman.
The Queen and her advisers decided the new statement was needed because the issue had never been addressed in previous letters patent on the HRH status, dating back from the reign of Queen Victoria.
Just as those letters patent were still in force, so it was intended that yesterday's changes would serve for future generations, with no-one named in the new declaration.
Until this year no members of the royal family had been faced with the need to give up titles or styles on divorce.
When the problem was first considered, at the time of the Yorks' divorce, discussions about the possible future use of HRH by Diana were continuing.
It was not possible to make a definitive statement until those discussions were completed and all aspects of the situation could be considered, the palace spokeswoman said.
Letters patent are one of the ways in which the sovereign's will is expressed, for instance to announce Royal Assent to parliamentary Bills.
The wording follows a traditional form which includes the use of the ancient concept of the sovereign being ``pleased'' to announce.
It says: ``The Queen has been pleased by Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the Realm dated 21st August 1996 to declare that a former wife (other than a widow until she shall remarry) of a son of a Sovereign of these Realms, of a son of a son of a Sovereign and of the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales shall not be entitled to hold and enjoy the style, title or attribute of Royal Highness.''
The Queen signs a warrant directing the issue of letters patent, which are prepared in the Crown Office, within the Lord Chancellor's Department.
The Great Seal of the Realm is affixed, and the document is then published in the London Gazette, which is circulated to government departments and embassies.
The present rules about the use of HRH were laid down on the orders of King George V nearly eight decades ago, modifying previous letters patent issued by Queen Victoria in 1861.
The 1917 rules are that HRH be confined to children of the sovereign, the children of the sons of the sovereign, and the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales.
Yesterday's rules apply to the former wives of those offspring.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article