A SCOTS heart surgeon said last night he had acted ''by the book'' in
an affair which has brought him under pressure from colleagues to quit
his post.
Mr Duncan Walker, credited with saving the lives of thousands of
children at Killingbeck Hospital in Leeds, has been told that patient
care is at risk because of the atmosphere he has created.
The alienation of Mr Walker's fellow doctors and surgeons followed an
investigation earlier this year into allegations that another heart
surgeon, Mr Unni Nair, had been bribed to move NHS patients up the
waiting list.
This was based on telephone conversations which Mr Walker had taped
and passed to the local health authority. Mr Nair was immediately
suspended and the police were called in, but after a three-month
investigation he was exonerated.
Mr Walker, 52, whose fund-raising for the hospital earned him the
title Yorkshireman of the Year in 1990, has been on sick leave since
February with septicaemia caused by a rose thorn which pricked his
finger.
''It was quite serious -- I nearly lost my hand -- but I have
scheduled my next clinic for the first week in June,'' he said.
Mr Walker alleges that a GP in Bradford offered Mr Nair #2500 over the
phone to admit a patient, in effect moving him up the waiting list.
''What he was asking was highly illegal. I taped the conversation and
my secretary took a shorthand note of a conversation he had with her. I
immediately took the advice of my legal advisers, the Medical and Dental
Defence Union of Scotland, and they advised me to hand the tape over to
the regional health authority's legal department, which I did.
Remarks in the tape about Mr Nair brought him into the frame, but he
was cleared after the investigation.
Mr Walker said: ''This matter isn't really about Unni Nair or Duncan
Walker -- Mr Nair is a good friend of mine and attended my birthday
party last year. It's about the fact that the health authority think
that, by shooting the messenger, they can sweep the message under the
carpet.''
Mr Walker attended a meeting last month of the Killingbeck Consultant
Staff Committee; his colleagues claimed his return would create
considerable tension in the hospital, which would make the running of
the operating theatre department particularly difficult.
As evidence of their loss of confidence, they cited the decline of
referrals of new patients to Mr Walker, once one of the busiest heart
surgeons in the country doing 20 operations a week. Now his waiting list
is 29 compared to Mr Nair's 174 and two other colleagues' 291 and 114.
The committee have asked the chief executive of the United Leeds
Teaching Hospital Trust to meet Mr Walker to consider his position, but
a spokesman for the trust said there would be no action until Mr Walker
returned from sick-leave. In the meantime, it had no comment.
Born in Uddingston, near Glasgow, Mr Walker has had a remarkable
career. He left school at 15 and served his apprenticeship as an
engineer in the shipyards. But on his uncle's advice he left heavy
engineering and went to study medicine at Glasgow University, where he
was on the students' union board with, among others, the late John
Smith.
He worked at Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Great Ormond Street in London,
and in Alabama before joining Killingbeck as a children's heart surgeon.
His pioneering surgery included reconstruction of a six-month-old
boy's heart using a pig heart and human donor tissue, and other
transplant firsts on young patients and on adults. He was credited with
phenomenal work sometimes running at 20 operations a week.
Mr Walker also became a celebrity because of his fund-raising work. He
mounted a campaign in the 1980s to raise #1m for the hospital's
paediatric intensive care unit.
''I have been here 20 years and worked my backside off,'' he said. ''I
have acted according to the instructions of the defence union -- I made
no accusations, I simply handed the tape over. It was the health
authority, not I, who called in the police. I am really disgusted at
what is happening now.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article