FLOWER of Scotland has been declared the "people's choice" for a national anthem, according to a poll unveiled yesterday.
The song netted 41per cent of the vote in an online survey launched last month by the Royal Scottish National Orchestra (RSNO).
It was a clear favourite, beating Scotland the Brave into second place with 29per cent. Highland Cathedral, a favourite of First Minister Jack McConnell, won 17per cent of the vote. A Man's a Man for a' That polled 7per cent and Scots'Wha Hae netted 6per cent.
More than 10,000 people responded after having the chance to listen to RSNO recordings of the five contenders on the orchestra's website.
Votes were cast from across the world, with the majority from the UK. A significant number responded from the US, Canada, and from remote locations such as Mongolia, New Caledonia and Christmas Island.
The winner, written by the late Roy Williamson of The Corries, was announced at the Last Night of the RSNO Proms at Glasgow's Royal Concert Hall. Simon Woods, chief executive of RSNO, said: "I am thrilled that the RSNO has been able to use its position as Scotland's national orchestra to propel forward the debate on a new national anthem for Scotland."
The orchestra ran the poll amid the ongoing debate about what the country's national anthem should be. It has been prompted by different sports playing different songs before Scotland matches.
Flower of Scotland is regularly played at football and rugby grounds, while athletes have traditionally celebrated medals with Scotland the Brave.
In March, Mr McConnell called for a public debate on the issue. However, after consideration, MSPs on the enterprise and culture committee of the Scottish Parliament dismissed the idea that Holyrood should launch that debate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article