A POLITICIAN'S tirade against the British union flag as "the butcher's apron" escalated yesterday into a major spat within the Scottish National Party.
Sandra White, the Glasgow MSP at the heart of the row, was accused by her office assistant of falsely denying that she had approved the controversial comments.
Mark Hirst, the researcher and press officer, resigned and placed the blame for the debacle on his former boss. He continues to work at Holyrood for Christine Grahame MSP, but said his "professional integrity has been undermined".
The spat exposes divisions within the SNP as MSPs battle for the best placings at next year's elections and activists put growing pressure on Alex Salmond's leadership. The Edinburgh Pentlands party circulated a letter to MSPs complaining the Holyrood group is not fighting for independence.
The row over the flag comments follows a press statement responding to a speech made last weekend by Gordon Brown, the chancellor.
He argued there should be more celebration of Britain and its flag. The response said the union flag was described by most Scots as "the butcher's apron", an association with bloodshed at the hands of government forces in Scotland after the 1745 Jacobite uprising and in empire days.
It linked the flag to Highland clearances, suppression of the clans and disproportionate losses of Scottish soldiers in British military adventures, concentration camps in the Boer war, massacres in India and Kenya and the Bloody Sunday massacre in Northern Ireland - an area from which the SNP has distanced itself.
Ms White, a Glasgow MSP, had retracted the statement and claimed not to have agreed with any of it. But yesterday, Mr Hirst released an e-mail exchange showing the MSP approved the comment and cut out part of the statement.
Ms White, party spokeswoman on equality issues, faces a battle to get re-elected at next year's Holyrood election. Although she topped the Glasgow SNP list in 2003, beating Nicola Sturgeon, the leadership is working to ensure Ms Sturgeon and Bashir Ahmad, a councillor in the city, are next year placed above Ms White.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article