ACAMPAIGN against the GBP5m revamp of a historic street gathered momentum when residents held a public meeting to outline their concerns at the project.
Edinburgh City Council plans for the Grassmarket include new lighting, cobblestones and an open space for pavement cafes. But residents say the proposals will destroy the character of the area and encourage antisocial behaviour. They have also complained that the plans would mean losing dozens of parking spaces.
Bill Cowan, who runs the Costume Ha Ha store there and is also on the Old Town Association and the Old Town Community Council, said residents and businesses were angry their concerns were ignored during consultation.
He said last night: "There are various concerns, including parking restrictions and the cutting down of some of the trees, and also that people's concerns about the style of the improvements don't seem to have been acknowledged."
Sarah Boyack, Edinburgh MSP, also raised concerns. She said: "People are not against there being a withdrawal of some parking spaces, but the general consensus is that there are far too many being lost.
"The key thing is local people feel that, although they turned up to a lot of the consultations, they don't feel their views have been taken on board."
Ewan Aitken, council leader, said: "It's simply not true to say that the consultation 'ignored local opinion' as the proposals started from an intense weekend workshop with the local community and a number of alterations were made to the scheme through the succeeding consultation process, involving several public meetings and meetings with the local traders."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article