The 43-year-old star, who found fame as an actor through the Bafta-winning detective series in the 1990s alongside Caroline Que ntin, complained that the licence fee-funded broadcaster was “driving down talent costs”.
In June, the BBC’s highest-earning stars – including Jonathan Ross, Jeremy Clarkson, Bruce Forsyth and Sir Terry Wogan – were warned their pay will be cut by up to 40%.
It emerged that any entertainers earning more than £100,000 a year faced a pay cut of 25% when their contracts are renegotiated, and for the highly-paid stars the salary reduction could be as much as 40%.
Now Davies, who like his QI co-star Stephen Fry is an avid Twitter user, has raised his concerns about the talent cuts. During a Twitter chat, Davies wrote: “Just had a 25% pay cut on Jonathan Creek. The BBC are driving down talent costs.”
He later explained the show’s design budget had been cut by “more than half” adding: “Yes, it does worry me.”
He said he was annoyed by the reduction in his pay but was concerned about the impact on programme quality. “Absolutely it will effect the show ... I’m all for driving down exec costs,” he added.
Davies is due to start filming this month for a 90-minute special, The Judas Tree, which is set to be broadcast at Easter next year.
The series, which originally ran from 1997 to 2004, returned for a one-off special, The Grinning Man, which drew 9 million viewers on New Year’s Day this year.
A BBC spokesman said the corporation did not comment on individual salaries but denied the show’s budget had been cut by as much as Davies claimed. “It’s absolutely not true the design budget has been cut by more than half,” the spokesman said.
“We are making efficiencies on this show just as on many others but it is not to the level that has been suggested,” he added.
News of the cuts to star talent were broken by Mark Thompson, the corporation’s director-general, in a meeting to which about 100 of the BBC’s best-known television, news and radio stars were invited. Presenter Jonathan Ross, 48, who is on £5.6m a year was expected to be among those to be hit with the maximum cut.
Around 40 BBC television and radio stars are reportedly earning more than £1m a year including Graham Norton, the 46-year-old camp comic and presenter whose £2.5m-a-year deal comes up for renewal at the end of this year and has already said he is prepared to take a pay cut.
The Irishman’s last show, Totally Saturday, was a ratings flop and the presenter is said to have hated it.
But earlier this week it emerged he may quit the BBC and was in talks with Channel 4 to take over Paul O’Grady’s daytime talk show. O’Grady is understood to be threatening to quit Channel 4 in a row over budget cuts.
Last month Jana Bennett, head of the BBC’s television channels said the broadcaster would not disclose the salaries of its top stars because the public would not understand why they are so high.
Speaking at the Edinburgh International Television Festival, Ms Bennett, director of BBC Vision, said that BBC staff deserved to be treated differently from workers in other areas of the public sector. But Shadow Culture Secretary Ed Vaizey has outlined plans to compel the BBC to publish details of its stars’ salaries.
The BBC has cut 7200 jobs over the past four-and-a-half years, with another 1200 to go, and is making efficiency savings of £1.9bn by 2013.
Meanwhile broadcasting veteran Wogan has risked the wrath of newsreaders after describing their craft as “the easiest job in the media”.
The BBC Radio 2 breakfast show host laid into huffy “self important” presenters whose job, he says, is “a piece of cake”. Wogan, who has an audience of nearly 8 million for his radio show, blasted the profession in his forthcoming book Where Was I? The World According To Terry Wogan.
In the book, to be published on September 9, the 71-year-old star referred to an incident in which a journalist stormed out of a studio because he did not want to be in the same newsroom as his co-presenter.
He speculated that the journalist had a fit of pique because his co-host was associated with make-over shows rather than hard news.
Alan Davies
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article